Choosing a trustee is one of the most consequential decisions in estate planning. Yet families often make that choice based on love, loyalty, or a desire to keep the peace — rather than on qualifications and capability. Here’s what to consider before naming someone to that critical role.
“Keeping Things Equal” Can Create Unequal Problems
The instinct to treat children equally is understandable, but equality isn’t always the right framework for trustee selection. Different people have different strengths. One child may be financially savvy but lack compassion. Another may be deeply caring but poor with money. A better approach is to match the role to the person — naming a financially capable child as trustee while designating a more empathetic sibling as healthcare surrogate. Catering to individual strengths protects everyone, including the beneficiaries.
Red Flags That Should Give You Pause
Not everyone who seems qualified actually is. A financial advisor isn’t automatically a good trustee — and may not even want the responsibility. An elderly sibling may be the obvious choice today but an unrealistic one for a long-term obligation. And in Florida’s diverse communities, it’s especially important to note that non-citizen trustees can trigger serious tax consequences. Before naming anyone, confirm they are a U.S. citizen, willing to serve, and fully understand the legal responsibilities involved.
The Power of “Desired Behaviors” Clauses
A well-drafted trust doesn’t just distribute assets — it communicates values. Including a “desired behaviors” section gives trustees clear guidance on the conditions under which distributions should be made. Whether that means requiring beneficiaries to maintain employment, avoid substance abuse, or contribute positively to their communities, these clauses transform a trustee’s judgment calls into documented, defensible decisions rooted in the grantor’s wishes.
Co-Trustees: Helpful or Harmful?
Co-trustees can work beautifully — or create chaos. When two people share a functional, communicative relationship, splitting responsibilities can ease the administrative burden. But when family dynamics are strained, co-trustees can become adversaries, with each second-guessing the other’s decisions. The history of a relationship is the best predictor of how co-trusteeship will play out. If siblings have clashed for decades, putting them in charge together is unlikely to change that.
Individual vs. Corporate Trustee
When family conflict is likely — or when a beneficiary is particularly difficult — a corporate trustee can be the right solution. Banks with trust departments bring professional objectivity, consistent administration, and institutional accountability. They won’t be bullied at Thanksgiving dinner. The tradeoff is a more formal relationship and associated fees. Weighing those factors against the emotional cost of placing that burden on a family member is a conversation worth having with an estate planning attorney.
How to Move Forward
Reviewing trustee selection doesn’t require starting over. Start by sitting down — alone or with a spouse — and listing potential trustees alongside their honest strengths and weaknesses. Consider whether an individual or corporate trustee better fits the situation. Then bring that information to an estate planning attorney who can help evaluate the options and make sure the trust document reflects the right choice. The goal isn’t just to name someone — it’s to name the right someone.
If you want to learn more about Life, Legacy & Wealth, check out https://sawyerandsawyerpa.com/podcast/
